Research

Herbicides for Annual Ryegrass Control

M.D. Plumer and S.A. Ebelhar

Two field studies were conducted at two locations to determine the efficacy of different herbicides on the control of annual ryegrass in row crop production. One study was conducted in Williamson county where treatments applied at two different stages of growth and in Hamilton county where a late planting was used because of wet conditions. The winter of 1997-98 was milder than average with above normal rainfall in the spring.

The variety used in the study was common Gulf and it was no-till drilled at 20 pounds/acre on Sept.28th and March 15th at the Williamson county site, and October 15th at the Hamilton county site. Herbicides were applied on May 22nd at Williamson county site and June 19th and June 23rd at Hamilton county. The September 28th seeding was fully headed at time of herbicide application; the March 15th seeding was in boot stage at time of herbicide application in Williamson county. At Hamilton county, the plot had received 1 quart of Roundup in May, and was in the mature stage when sprayed on June 19th. Ratings taken 10 days after spraying (10 DAS). Rating of 10 is perfect weed control.

Table 1. Williamson county September 28th seeding
Herbicide
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Gramoxone Extra
Gramoxone Extra
Touchdown
Touchdown
Fusion
Fusion
Check
Fultime
Rate/A.
1.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
1.0 pt
2.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
6 oz.
10 oz.
na
4.0 qt
Ryegrass control 10 DAS
9
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
2
9


Table 2. Williamson county March 15th seeding
Herbicide
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra +2%N+pH 5.2
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Gramoxone Extra
Gramoxone Extra
Touchdown
Touchdown
Fusion
Sencor 75DF
Fultime
Check
Rate/A.
1.0 pt
8 oz.
1.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
1.0 pt
2.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
6 oz.
8 oz.
4.0 qt
na
Ryegrass control 10 DAS
9
8
9
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
3
10
2


Table 3. Hamilton county

Herbicide
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Gramoxone Extra
Gramoxone Extra
Touchdown
Touchdown
Fusion
Fusion
Check

Rate/A.
1.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
1.0 pt
2.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
6 oz.
10 oz.
na
Ryegrass control 10 DAS/45 DAS
8/3
8/8
9/9
9/9
10/10
9/10
9/10
10/10
10/10
7/7
+Fultime 4 qt./A
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5

Ryegrass provided excellent suppression of other weeds at the Hamilton county site while the Williamson county had significant weed growth as well as excessive rainfall. Species were giant foxtail, teaweed, smooth pigweed, yellow nutsedge.

Table 4. Hamilton county weed suppression burndown herbicide only (45 DAS)
Herbicide
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Roundup Ultra
Gramoxone Extra
Gramoxone Extra
Touchdown
Touchdown
Fusion
Fusion
Check
Rate/A.
1.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
1.0 pt
2.0 pt
1.5 pt
2.0 pt
6 oz.
10 oz.
na
Broadleaf
9
9
9
8
8
8
9
8
8
6
Grass
10
9
9
7
7
9
9
8
9
4

In the first year of the study it appears there is an advantage for the use of ryegrass in weed suppression. At the Williamson county site , ryegrass was easy to control at the boot stage as well as at early heading. Evaluation of the site on October 30th showed no evidence of ryegrass in the plots after no-till corn. Plots will be monitored next spring to see if any ryegrass has emerged.

Ryegrass As a Soybean Cover Crop

By Mike Plumer

Ryegrass can be used as a flexible cover crop to help in weed control and increase soil tilth. A study was designed to compare 15" rows to 7 ½" rows in no-till soybean production to compare weed control and yield.

Design of the project was 3 replications in a completely randomized block. Ryegrass was a blend of varieties of common ryegrass, planted at 20 pounds/ acre on Oct 2, 1999 by no-till drill. Previous crop was corn and the field has been in continuous no-till for 17 years. Soil test : 6.7 pH, 87 P1, 395 K20, organic matter 2.4% and Robbs soil type on 3 % slope. Planting methods: for the drilled plots a Marliss no-till drill with 7 ½" spacing, for the 15" rows a John Deere 7000 no-till planter planted to split the middles. Seeding rate: 220,000 seeds/acre of FS Hisoy 4426.

The ryegrass block was sprayed and planted on May 9, 2000. Herbicide was 24 oz. of Roundup Ultra in 10 gallon of pH adjusted water/acre (to 5.2 pH by citric acid) with 1 quart of 32% nitrogen and ½% surfactant. Fertility applied broadcast 125# of 18-46-0 and 180 # 0-0-60/acre. Ryegrass dry matter samples averaged 1538#/acre on the plots at planting.

Table 1. Soybean population at 4 weeks
Rows
15" rows
7 1/2" rows
Rep 1
198,000
187,300
Rep 2
206,500
191,600
Rep 3
195,100
184,100


Table 2. Soybean weed control at 4 weeks*
Rows
15" rows
7 1/2" rows
Grass
9
9
Broadleaf
8
9

*rating 1= no control, 10= perfect weed control

Weed control was not as good as expected with the grass weeds being giant foxtail, and the broadleaf weeds were smooth pigweed and annual morninglory. A post applied herbicide was used on all the plots: 6 oz. Fusion/ acre, 8 oz. Reflex/acre in 12 gallons water/ acre (adjusted to 5.2pH) with ½% surfactant and 2 quarts 32% nitrogen on June 7th. Rainfall during May 5.4" and June 8.9" probably reduced the level of weed control by the cover crop.

Weed control was evaluated again on July 3rd.

Table 3. Soybean weed control at 8 weeks
Rows
15" rows
7 1/2" rows
Grass
10
10
Broadleaf
10
10

Plots were harvested on Oct 22, with no weeds present in any of the plots. The yields of the plots were adjusted to 13% moisture.

Table 4. Soybean yield at 13% moisture bushels/acre
Rows
15" rows
7 1/2" rows
Rep 1
10
10
Rep 2
10
10
Rep 3
10
10
Ave.
10
10


Cost of Production: per acre
Seed
Fertilizer
Herbicides:
Roundup Ultra
Adjuvants
Fusion
Reflex
Adjuvants
$24.00
22.38


7.88
1.00
7.00
6.60
1.00
Total:$69.86


Land Cost
Land cost
Total variable costs
$75.00
$191.24


Income
15" rows
43.1bu. @ $5.45
7 1/2" rows
47.8 bu @ $5.45

$234.90

$260.51

return to labor/machinery

$43.66

$69.27